Arrests Made in Alappuzha After Restaurant’s Vishu Advertisement Featuring Lord Krishna and Kuzhimandhi Sparks Widespread Outrage
Cherthala police arrest two men from Mehr Mandi & Grills after a controversial Vishu advertisement featuring Lord Krishna and a non-vegetarian Kuzhimandhi dish sparked outrage in Alappuzha. The incident, involving the son of an IUML politician, has led to charges under Section 192 of the BNS for inciting riots and hurting religious sentiments during the Kerala Hindu festival.
The controversy erupted after the restaurant posted the advertisement on the auspicious occasion of Vishu, a Hindu festival predominantly celebrated in Kerala during which Lord Krishna is worshipped. The digital poster featured the message “Happy Vishu—Mehr’s wishes to everyone” but drew immediate backlash for its "objectionable" and "disrespectful" imagery showing the deity in front of a meat dish. According to the First Information Report (FIR), the post was shared with the intentional motive of hurting Hindu sentiments. While the advertisement was initially circulated via WhatsApp on the day of the festival, April 15, 2026, the subsequent outcry prompted co-owner Mohammed Shemir to release a public apology video. In his statement, Shemir claimed the design had been outsourced and attributed the incident to a mistake by the designer, pleading for forgiveness for the unintentional mental distress caused to the community.
Legal proceedings have been initiated under Section 192 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which addresses individuals who intentionally incite others to cause riots. The incident has drawn sharp reactions from various quarters, including Malayalam actor Unni Mukundan, who described the post as "complete hatred" and urged others to respect the feelings of believers. Public discourse surrounding the event has been polarized; while some users questioned the "basic cultural sense" of the owners and designers, others on platforms like X criticized the continued circulation of the image by those protesting it, suggesting that reposting the content repeats the original mistake.
This incident has ignited a broader debate regarding the normalization of such behavior and the perceived silenceof the masses when Hindu sentiments are targeted. Critics have argued that the design reveals a specific mindset rather than an innocent error, suggesting that a similar occurrence involving another community would have resulted in declarations that secularism is dead. As the legal process against Arshad and Shamnas moves forward, the event stands as a stark reminder of the volatile intersection between commercial marketing, social media, and religious identity in Kerala, with many fearing the long-term decline of cultural and religious values rooted in the state’s identity.

Comment List